<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On background, foreground and genre in Greek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2010/03/on-background-foreground-and-genre-in-greek/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2010/03/on-background-foreground-and-genre-in-greek/</link>
	<description>Removing the mystery from discourse grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:31:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A blog about New Testament Greek Discourse &#171; SportLinguist</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2010/03/on-background-foreground-and-genre-in-greek/comment-page-1/#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator>A blog about New Testament Greek Discourse &#171; SportLinguist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=1079#comment-1888</guid>
		<description>[...] came across this great post today while I was searching for people who have cited Stephen Wallace&#8217;s work on Figure-Ground [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came across this great post today while I was searching for people who have cited Stephen Wallace&#8217;s work on Figure-Ground [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why bother with theoretical frameworks? &#124; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2010/03/on-background-foreground-and-genre-in-greek/comment-page-1/#comment-1623</link>
		<dc:creator>Why bother with theoretical frameworks? &#124; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=1079#comment-1623</guid>
		<description>[...] in the model itself. If the implementation of a model reveals flaws, one should go back to &#8220;what we know to be true&#8221; from the typological studies of these phenomena. In other words, if the boulder field and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the model itself. If the implementation of a model reveals flaws, one should go back to &#8220;what we know to be true&#8221; from the typological studies of these phenomena. In other words, if the boulder field and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markedness: qualitative versus quantitative, part 2 &#124; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2010/03/on-background-foreground-and-genre-in-greek/comment-page-1/#comment-1605</link>
		<dc:creator>Markedness: qualitative versus quantitative, part 2 &#124; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 14:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=1079#comment-1605</guid>
		<description>[...] Porter&#8217;s model of grounding in discourse, discussed in a series of posts beginning here; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Porter&#8217;s model of grounding in discourse, discussed in a series of posts beginning here; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the need for claiming a third plane of discourse in Greek &#124; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2010/03/on-background-foreground-and-genre-in-greek/comment-page-1/#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>On the need for claiming a third plane of discourse in Greek &#124; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=1079#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>[...] of the relationship between tense, aspect and mood in language on the one hand, and the impact of genre-specific factors on the other hand. These are the two factors from Porter&#8217;s linguistic literature that he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the relationship between tense, aspect and mood in language on the one hand, and the impact of genre-specific factors on the other hand. These are the two factors from Porter&#8217;s linguistic literature that he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On background and foreground versus frontground in Greek &#124; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2010/03/on-background-foreground-and-genre-in-greek/comment-page-1/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>On background and foreground versus frontground in Greek &#124; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=1079#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>[...] like &#8220;number&#8221; or &#8220;person,&#8221; especially in Greek. The next two posts (here and here) focused on Porter&#8217;s claims that each aspect plays a certain prominence role (e.g. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] like &#8220;number&#8221; or &#8220;person,&#8221; especially in Greek. The next two posts (here and here) focused on Porter&#8217;s claims that each aspect plays a certain prominence role (e.g. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On grounding and synonymous terminology &#124; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2010/03/on-background-foreground-and-genre-in-greek/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>On grounding and synonymous terminology &#124; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=1079#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>[...] earlier post in this series highlighted the difference in scope between what most linguists would claim about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] earlier post in this series highlighted the difference in scope between what most linguists would claim about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on background, foreground and genre &#124; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2010/03/on-background-foreground-and-genre-in-greek/comment-page-1/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>More on background, foreground and genre &#124; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=1079#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>[...] post takes up a point raised here regarding the problems associated with making claims of global prominence of verbal aspect based [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post takes up a point raised here regarding the problems associated with making claims of global prominence of verbal aspect based [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

