<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Approaches to Word Order in NT Greek-SFL V</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/08/approaches-to-word-order-in-nt-greek-sfl-v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/08/approaches-to-word-order-in-nt-greek-sfl-v/</link>
	<description>Removing the mystery from discourse grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent search strings &#171; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/08/approaches-to-word-order-in-nt-greek-sfl-v/comment-page-1/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent search strings &#171; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=640#comment-1360</guid>
		<description>[...] in hallidayan theory: I recall saying a thing or two about Halliday here, but I am surprised at how much traffic it has generated for not being a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in hallidayan theory: I recall saying a thing or two about Halliday here, but I am surprised at how much traffic it has generated for not being a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emphatic pronouns and other urban legends &#171; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/08/approaches-to-word-order-in-nt-greek-sfl-v/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Emphatic pronouns and other urban legends &#171; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=640#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>[...] This claim left me without words for a while. I was surprised that a scholar of his caliber would still hold to such a view in light of the work by Levinsohn and others in the area of information structure. Nick Bailey&#8217;s dissertation is a huge contribution, but it is certainly not the first to provide a coherent, linguistically viable description of Koine information structure. There are two basic functions of pronouns in the information structure system of Koine when they are not semantically required. Viewing them as &#8220;placeholders&#8221; is a key to moving forward (see the series of posts here). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This claim left me without words for a while. I was surprised that a scholar of his caliber would still hold to such a view in light of the work by Levinsohn and others in the area of information structure. Nick Bailey&#8217;s dissertation is a huge contribution, but it is certainly not the first to provide a coherent, linguistically viable description of Koine information structure. There are two basic functions of pronouns in the information structure system of Koine when they are not semantically required. Viewing them as &#8220;placeholders&#8221; is a key to moving forward (see the series of posts here). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFL update-Halliday on Hallidayan Linguistics &#171; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/08/approaches-to-word-order-in-nt-greek-sfl-v/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>SFL update-Halliday on Hallidayan Linguistics &#171; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=640#comment-792</guid>
		<description>[...] I cannot emphasize this enough. This is also a follow-up to a series of posts culminating here on why I am not a systemic functional linguist. In the name of practicing what I preach, and in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I cannot emphasize this enough. This is also a follow-up to a series of posts culminating here on why I am not a systemic functional linguist. In the name of practicing what I preach, and in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Runge</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/08/approaches-to-word-order-in-nt-greek-sfl-v/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Runge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=640#comment-659</guid>
		<description>D &amp; T, if you have attended these sessions  in years past then I probably know your face, but had no name attached to it. Be sure to look for me in New Orleans. I like faces with names, it provides closure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D &#038; T, if you have attended these sessions  in years past then I probably know your face, but had no name attached to it. Be sure to look for me in New Orleans. I like faces with names, it provides closure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c. stirling bartholomew</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/08/approaches-to-word-order-in-nt-greek-sfl-v/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>c. stirling bartholomew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 18:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=640#comment-658</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see any reason why you need to explain not following SFL. I took a long hard look at it in the 90s and decided the shortcomings were numerous and serious. They become most obvious when you read the monographs by the most notable advocates. Working my way through Reed&#039;s Phillipian&#039;s finished it for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see any reason why you need to explain not following SFL. I took a long hard look at it in the 90s and decided the shortcomings were numerous and serious. They become most obvious when you read the monographs by the most notable advocates. Working my way through Reed&#8217;s Phillipian&#8217;s finished it for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danielandtonya</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/08/approaches-to-word-order-in-nt-greek-sfl-v/comment-page-1/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>danielandtonya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=640#comment-657</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Very helpful series. This post in particular (in light of the rest) explained to us why we&#039;ve been lost during many papers in the Biblical Greek and Linguistics sessions at SBL the last few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Very helpful series. This post in particular (in light of the rest) explained to us why we&#8217;ve been lost during many papers in the Biblical Greek and Linguistics sessions at SBL the last few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
