http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/ Removing the mystery from discourse grammar Mon, 23 Jan 2012 01:31:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-2883 Clarifying Allan & Kemmer on Middle Voice: Markedness « ΕΝ ΕΦΕΣΩ Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:28:07 +0000 http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-2883 [...] middle is to view it through the lens of asymmetrical markedness. Those of you who have followed Steve Runge’s blog or picked up his recently published grammar (Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament) should [...] [...] middle is to view it through the lens of asymmetrical markedness. Those of you who have followed Steve Runge’s blog or picked up his recently published grammar (Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament) should [...]

]]> http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-1597 Markedness: qualitative versus quantitative | NT Discourse Fri, 14 May 2010 14:21:24 +0000 http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-1597 [...] time ago I provided a brief introduction to markedness. This has been a somewhat difficult area to explain, due both to misconceptions and [...] [...] time ago I provided a brief introduction to markedness. This has been a somewhat difficult area to explain, due both to misconceptions and [...]

]]> http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-799 Systemic functional linguistics and word order-SFL IV « NT Discourse Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:53:09 +0000 http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-799 [...] kind of clause (primary, secondary, embedded), then ranks them using a classic SFL cline where the markedness or prominence of a particular order is inversely proportional to its frequency. In other words, the [...] [...] kind of clause (primary, secondary, embedded), then ranks them using a classic SFL cline where the markedness or prominence of a particular order is inversely proportional to its frequency. In other words, the [...]

]]> http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-748 Gentle Wisdom» Blog Archive » Anthropos, gender and markedness, part 2 Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:47:01 +0000 http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-748 [...] of posts earlier this year on his NT Discourse blog. The most important post for this discussion is the first one; in his other with the markedness tag he applies this theory to Greek verbs and discourse. Here is [...] [...] of posts earlier this year on his NT Discourse blog. The most important post for this discussion is the first one; in his other with the markedness tag he applies this theory to Greek verbs and discourse. Here is [...]

]]> http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-563 Translating Pragmatics – Lessons from the Apostolic Fathers « ΕΝ ΕΦΕΣΩ Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:53:45 +0000 http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-563 [...] Focus as well as Asymmetrical Markedness. Those of you who have been following Steve’s blog (introduction HERE) should have a pretty good grasp of the latter, but we’ll review it [...] [...] Focus as well as Asymmetrical Markedness. Those of you who have been following Steve’s blog (introduction HERE) should have a pretty good grasp of the latter, but we’ll review it [...]

]]> http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-463 Case: Nominative & Accusative « ΕΝ ΕΦΕΣΩ Sun, 03 May 2009 04:52:55 +0000 http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-463 [...] familiar with Markedness Theory, particularly asymmetrical markedness (the most relevant post is HERE). But as a refresher, asymmetrical marked says that in a set, a given member is viewed as the [...] [...] familiar with Markedness Theory, particularly asymmetrical markedness (the most relevant post is HERE). But as a refresher, asymmetrical marked says that in a set, a given member is viewed as the [...]

]]> http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-326 Markedness and patterns « NT Discourse Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:49:49 +0000 http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-326 [...] to discuss regarding markedness is the power of pattern recognition (the posts on markedness begin here). I make the point in the introduction of the Discourse Grammar (sec. 1.4) that most devices that [...] [...] to discuss regarding markedness is the power of pattern recognition (the posts on markedness begin here). I make the point in the introduction of the Discourse Grammar (sec. 1.4) that most devices that [...]

]]> http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-286 Markedness, Part 3 « NT Discourse Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:20:24 +0000 http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-286 [...] for its application to a description of the historical present in the gospel of Mark. The first post described the basic organizational framework provided by an asymmetrical view of markedness. The [...] [...] for its application to a description of the historical present in the gospel of Mark. The first post described the basic organizational framework provided by an asymmetrical view of markedness. The [...]

]]> http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-235 Markedness, Part 2 « NT Discourse Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:34:12 +0000 http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-235 [...] is the second part of an introduction to markedness, specifically an asymmetrical view. In the first part, I talked about how the default is the most basic member of a complex set, the option that [...] [...] is the second part of an introduction to markedness, specifically an asymmetrical view. In the first part, I talked about how the default is the most basic member of a complex set, the option that [...]

]]>