<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction to markedness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/</link>
	<description>Removing the mystery from discourse grammar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:43:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markedness: qualitative versus quantitative &#124; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-1597</link>
		<dc:creator>Markedness: qualitative versus quantitative &#124; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-1597</guid>
		<description>[...] time ago I provided a brief introduction to markedness. This has been a somewhat difficult area to explain, due both to misconceptions and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time ago I provided a brief introduction to markedness. This has been a somewhat difficult area to explain, due both to misconceptions and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Systemic functional linguistics and word order-SFL IV &#171; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Systemic functional linguistics and word order-SFL IV &#171; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 16:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-799</guid>
		<description>[...] kind of clause (primary, secondary, embedded), then ranks them using a classic SFL cline where the markedness or prominence of a particular order is inversely proportional to its frequency. In other words, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] kind of clause (primary, secondary, embedded), then ranks them using a classic SFL cline where the markedness or prominence of a particular order is inversely proportional to its frequency. In other words, the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gentle Wisdom&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anthropos, gender and markedness, part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Gentle Wisdom&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Anthropos, gender and markedness, part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-748</guid>
		<description>[...] of posts earlier this year on his NT Discourse blog. The most important post for this discussion is the first one; in his other with the markedness tag he applies this theory to Greek verbs and discourse. Here is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of posts earlier this year on his NT Discourse blog. The most important post for this discussion is the first one; in his other with the markedness tag he applies this theory to Greek verbs and discourse. Here is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Translating Pragmatics &#8211; Lessons from the Apostolic Fathers &#171; ΕΝ ΕΦΕΣΩ</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Translating Pragmatics &#8211; Lessons from the Apostolic Fathers &#171; ΕΝ ΕΦΕΣΩ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-563</guid>
		<description>[...] Focus as well as Asymmetrical Markedness. Those of you who have been following Steve’s blog (introduction HERE) should have a pretty good grasp of the latter, but we’ll review it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Focus as well as Asymmetrical Markedness. Those of you who have been following Steve’s blog (introduction HERE) should have a pretty good grasp of the latter, but we’ll review it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Case: Nominative &#38; Accusative &#171; ΕΝ ΕΦΕΣΩ</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator>Case: Nominative &#38; Accusative &#171; ΕΝ ΕΦΕΣΩ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 04:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-463</guid>
		<description>[...] familiar with Markedness Theory, particularly asymmetrical markedness (the most relevant post is HERE). But as a refresher, asymmetrical marked says that in a set, a given member is viewed as the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] familiar with Markedness Theory, particularly asymmetrical markedness (the most relevant post is HERE). But as a refresher, asymmetrical marked says that in a set, a given member is viewed as the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markedness and patterns &#171; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Markedness and patterns &#171; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-326</guid>
		<description>[...] to discuss regarding markedness is the power of pattern recognition (the posts on markedness begin here). I make the point in the introduction of the Discourse Grammar (sec. 1.4) that most devices that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to discuss regarding markedness is the power of pattern recognition (the posts on markedness begin here). I make the point in the introduction of the Discourse Grammar (sec. 1.4) that most devices that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markedness, Part 3 &#171; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Markedness, Part 3 &#171; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-286</guid>
		<description>[...] for its application to a description of the historical present in the gospel of Mark. The first post described the basic organizational framework provided by an asymmetrical view of markedness. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for its application to a description of the historical present in the gospel of Mark. The first post described the basic organizational framework provided by an asymmetrical view of markedness. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markedness, Part 2 &#171; NT Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.ntdiscourse.org/2009/01/introduction-to-markedness/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Markedness, Part 2 &#171; NT Discourse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ntdiscourse.org/?p=424#comment-235</guid>
		<description>[...] is the second part of an introduction to markedness, specifically an asymmetrical view. In the first part, I talked about how the default is the most basic member of a complex set, the option that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the second part of an introduction to markedness, specifically an asymmetrical view. In the first part, I talked about how the default is the most basic member of a complex set, the option that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
